"But what’s with the Stereotypical Portrayal of Cardinal Adeyemi"
Written by Peter Straughan, the film does an excellent job of immersing viewers in the Vatican’s intricate corridors of power, portraying the behind-the-scenes manoeuvring of the College of Cardinals with striking tension. As a narrative, it’s compelling, with strong performances and a script that keeps you engaged.
However, one part of the story left me uneasy: the depiction of Cardinal Adeyemi (played by Lucien Msamati), the only visibly African and Nigerian cardinal in the race. Adeyemi emerges as a serious contender for the high office, garnering 25 votes in the first round, until a scandal from his past involving a former relationship with Sister Shamusi is unearthed. This revelation leads to his sudden fall from grace.
While scandal and backstory are fair game in drama, the way this subplot plays out feels disappointing, even damaging. A Nigerian character at the centre of power is reduced to a narrative of moral failure and disgrace. It’s hard not to question why Cardinal Adeyemi’s arc had to follow this path, especially in a global film with limited African representation. With a real conclave on the horizon in May 2025, one can’t help but wonder about the impact of such portrayals on public perception.
Conclave is undoubtedly a strong film, but its handling of Cardinal Adeyemi’s character raises difficult questions about representation and narrative bias. It’s a good watch, but for me, it also left a bitter aftertaste.
- Jimi D Baldheaded Guy